6/30/2023 0 Comments Surfshark ubuntu install![]() SLyEZPdiIwteJbJJM/1a2gKpTM/Ko8Q2ItMED3/AC9gv4rIReFxsWBYBq+uzkQbL WLvczOW08e2oUCCfUSzQLqAMNIopex1bHWcXou7GvHOkgH9GltgUxId1v4x2X+YXīrjO6VMNq8689VmChwxIV5vrvarvvbA0jz5rN4pwJtFK+bSzVdIwX+je0AHvAO4S Jclp0qzNmaFrZ643wqNIzWM13RVbb88meU2Q9DzraF8OJlkS54gz/SlJlA5kUsWsĦa2zapid/EAoxZIhMaV265ycLwwA/Sh8ilrbjaTabH9xCvUywef/PDqDflzIhCYeĬS0gQFeNZe/HQp/RPwUgfqkAPhabM5xvWSYu9CvrZCIy0FlCW5ivbazZMm26fIV2 Zr5z+3Yiomf515H1cQDbvz+aHzaMG4iM5rBUowZ+3E3dLr7jO1SQ9Q1olnV5vvb4 MQGNBFxSwz0BDACoAGeNYqWGXVsHsgLCBxrEb/6n7quYf1Yu3c5rqvWshEzsCf/i Package 'surfshark-release' is not installed, so not removedĠ upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. Package 'surfshark' is not installed, so not removed + sudo apt-get remove -y surfshark surfshark-release This script requires superuser access to install apt package. N: See apt-secure(8) manpage for repository creation and user configuration details. N: Updating from such a repository can't be done securely, and is therefore disabled by default. W: GPG error: stretch InRelease: The following signatures were invalid: EXPKEYSIG 1DB7590E83C8F643 Surfshark package maintainer Į: The repository ' stretch InRelease' is not signed. The following signatures were invalid: EXPKEYSIG 1DB7590E83C8F643 Surfshark package maintainer I then ran the following commands after confirming the scripts from Surfsharks instructions were still on my computer: It turned out that the ocean.surfshark key was entered twice so I removed them using the Software Sources GUI/tool. As mentioned, I have been experiencing alot of other packages with error reports of multiple source entries and obsolete keys for some time, so I attacked that aspect of the problem. Being a stubborn old fool though, I pounded my head against the keyboard until I found a completely different solution this morning. I have no idea why I didnt think of your solution using Timeshift, as it been such a helpful tool on recent failures under Mint. ![]() Thank you so much for your reply! Forgive my hard headedness, as I was obviously having a bad day with computers, Mint 21.1 problems being obtusely stubborn. ![]() so I can still experiment if you've got something I should try. Still got this running on Linux Mint 20.3 on an even older laptop, as well as and this old WIN10 machine. Unfortunately I am NOT an expert on Linux Mint 21.1, so I dont immediately know how to fix the vender's own problems for them without causing myself a headache, this time. I shouldn't have to put up with this level of incompetence from supposed professionals in my retirement. I was an expert for server-based Linux systems. Doesnt anybody test ANYTHING anymore? I am an old hand, retired after 40 years with all operating systems and especially UNIX-based stuff. ![]() Optional Read Rant: This shows a complete disregard for the customer (as do other packages I could name here - not a unique issue). The script then fails to load the new (or the old) app because it's using the old, stale, unencrypted repository in the manual script, for quite obvious reason. Unfortunately, the manual update script deletes your old Shurfshark FIRST. So, I went to the website for manual update scripts and executed with simple copy-pastes. The terminal window popped up and claimed to have a successful install, but would not run the new app even after an OS restart and hardware reboot. So I was glad when I received notice to update from ver 1.2.3 to ver 1.2.6 today in the GUI. ![]() It's been showing for the Surfshark repository for months. They do not have their repositories properly key encrypted. I am really not happy with Surfshark, among other Linux FOSS providers, atm. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |